Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
WHERE appointmentId = 1
Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
worked.
Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
0:0:00'
WHERE appointmentId = 1
But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
will be inserted as DateTimes.
Any solution will be greatly appreciated.
I think that this will answer most of your questions:
http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/info_datetime.asp
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131553973.186824.98760@.o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com...
> Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
> I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
> Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
> The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
> Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
> Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
> Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
> English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
> Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
> I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
> UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
> worked.
> Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
> 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
> will be inserted as DateTimes.
> Any solution will be greatly appreciated.
>
|||Thanks Tibor, but I still have got one question:
If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
problem?
Therefore, don't worrying about SQL Server language, if I convert my
DateTime value (programming in C# for example) to string datatype in
unseparated format and execute the statement, will work? That is, SQL
Server will be able to understand it and store it in the appropiate
format?
I'll try tomorrow but can't be so easy.
What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause? I'm
using LIKE operator but it is rather language dependant: If SQL Server
in Spanish, "Ago 10,2005%" is the pattern. If in English, "Aug
10,2005%" is the pattern. Can this also be solved wihout using BETWEEN
and "<" and ">" operators, only with LIKE?
Thanks very much.
|||You should always use parameters and pass DateTime instead of string.
That would work for any locale and would also improve performance.
Best regards,
Ilya
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
*** Want to find answers instantly? Here's how... ***
1. Go to
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...mework ?hl=en
2. Type your question in the text box near "Search this group" button.
3. Hit "Search this group" button.
4. Read answer(s).
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131553973.186824.98760@.o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com...
> Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
> I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
> Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
> The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
> Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
> Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
> Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
> English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
> Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
> I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
> UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
> worked.
> Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
> 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
> will be inserted as DateTimes.
> Any solution will be greatly appreciated.
>
|||Do you mean always use parameters with update/insert statements against
SQL Mobile 2005 and SQL Server CE databases?
Any known problems when synchronizing with SQL Server (Spanish and
English versions mainly) via Merge Replication?
Could you please post an example of an update statement using
parameters?
Thanks very much. I'm willing to try tomorrow morning.
|||Yes, always. That makes conversion unnecessary and eliminates format
problems completely.
For example, DateTime is format-less, it's just a 64 bit integer.
The problem with formats only arises if you convert it to/from string. Which
also takes a lot of time.
Update/Insert sample is available in VS documentation, just look up
SqlCeCommand.Parameters property.
If your SQL Server DB uses collation which is not supported on the device,
you'll get NotSupportedException on attempt to replicate.
Best regards,
Ilya
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
*** Want to find answers instantly? Here's how... ***
1. Go to
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...mework ?hl=en
2. Type your question in the text box near "Search this group" button.
3. Hit "Search this group" button.
4. Read answer(s).
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131564804.366046.310110@.g43g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> Do you mean always use parameters with update/insert statements against
> SQL Mobile 2005 and SQL Server CE databases?
> Any known problems when synchronizing with SQL Server (Spanish and
> English versions mainly) via Merge Replication?
> Could you please post an example of an update statement using
> parameters?
> Thanks very much. I'm willing to try tomorrow morning.
>
|||> If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
> execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
> Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
> problem?
Yes.
> What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause?
Did you read the article? I have a long section about just that:
http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/inf...asp#Searching
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131563864.355665.61160@.g14g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
> Thanks Tibor, but I still have got one question:
> If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
> execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
> Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
> problem?
> Therefore, don't worrying about SQL Server language, if I convert my
> DateTime value (programming in C# for example) to string datatype in
> unseparated format and execute the statement, will work? That is, SQL
> Server will be able to understand it and store it in the appropiate
> format?
> I'll try tomorrow but can't be so easy.
> What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause? I'm
> using LIKE operator but it is rather language dependant: If SQL Server
> in Spanish, "Ago 10,2005%" is the pattern. If in English, "Aug
> 10,2005%" is the pattern. Can this also be solved wihout using BETWEEN
> and "<" and ">" operators, only with LIKE?
> Thanks very much.
>
|||Thanks Ilya for the "using parameters" advice. Many problems solved
this way.
Regards.
|||Thanks Tibor for that great article but I think parameters have solved
all my headaches ;-)
Kind regards,
|||Yep, I should add to the article that parametizing queries has bunch of advantages, among others
that ADO (or whatever API is used) will handle these things for you.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131612217.129555.137660@.g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> Thanks Tibor for that great article but I think parameters have solved
> all my headaches ;-)
> Kind regards,
>
Showing posts with label device. Show all posts
Showing posts with label device. Show all posts
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Being DateTime Formats aware when accessing database
Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
WHERE appointmentId = 1
Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
worked.
Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
0:0:00'
WHERE appointmentId = 1
But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
will be inserted as DateTimes.
Any solution will be greatly appreciated.I think that this will answer most of your questions:
http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/info_datetime.asp
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131553973.186824.98760@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
> I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
> Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
> The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
> Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
> Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
> Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
> English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
> Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
> I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
> UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
> worked.
> Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
> 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
> will be inserted as DateTimes.
> Any solution will be greatly appreciated.
>|||Thanks Tibor, but I still have got one question:
If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
problem?
Therefore, don't worrying about SQL Server language, if I convert my
DateTime value (programming in C# for example) to string datatype in
unseparated format and execute the statement, will work? That is, SQL
Server will be able to understand it and store it in the appropiate
format?
I'll try tomorrow but can't be so easy.
What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause? I'm
using LIKE operator but it is rather language dependant: If SQL Server
in Spanish, "Ago 10,2005%" is the pattern. If in English, "Aug
10,2005%" is the pattern. Can this also be solved wihout using BETWEEN
and "<" and ">" operators, only with LIKE?
Thanks very much.|||You should always use parameters and pass DateTime instead of string.
That would work for any locale and would also improve performance.
Best regards,
Ilya
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
*** Want to find answers instantly? Here's how... ***
1. Go to
http://groups-beta.google.com/group... />
work?hl=en
2. Type your question in the text box near "Search this group" button.
3. Hit "Search this group" button.
4. Read answer(s).
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131553973.186824.98760@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
> I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
> Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
> The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
> Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
> Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
> Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
> English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
> Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
> I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
> UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
> worked.
> Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
> 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
> will be inserted as DateTimes.
> Any solution will be greatly appreciated.
>|||Do you mean always use parameters with update/insert statements against
SQL Mobile 2005 and SQL Server CE databases?
Any known problems when synchronizing with SQL Server (Spanish and
English versions mainly) via Merge Replication?
Could you please post an example of an update statement using
parameters?
Thanks very much. I'm willing to try tomorrow morning.|||Yes, always. That makes conversion unnecessary and eliminates format
problems completely.
For example, DateTime is format-less, it's just a 64 bit integer.
The problem with formats only arises if you convert it to/from string. Which
also takes a lot of time.
Update/Insert sample is available in VS documentation, just look up
SqlCeCommand.Parameters property.
If your SQL Server DB uses collation which is not supported on the device,
you'll get NotSupportedException on attempt to replicate.
Best regards,
Ilya
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
*** Want to find answers instantly? Here's how... ***
1. Go to
http://groups-beta.google.com/group... />
work?hl=en
2. Type your question in the text box near "Search this group" button.
3. Hit "Search this group" button.
4. Read answer(s).
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131564804.366046.310110@.g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Do you mean always use parameters with update/insert statements against
> SQL Mobile 2005 and SQL Server CE databases?
> Any known problems when synchronizing with SQL Server (Spanish and
> English versions mainly) via Merge Replication?
> Could you please post an example of an update statement using
> parameters?
> Thanks very much. I'm willing to try tomorrow morning.
>|||> If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
> execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
> Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
> problem?
Yes.
> What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause?
Did you read the article? I have a long section about just that:
http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/in...e.asp#Searching
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131563864.355665.61160@.g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks Tibor, but I still have got one question:
> If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
> execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
> Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
> problem?
> Therefore, don't worrying about SQL Server language, if I convert my
> DateTime value (programming in C# for example) to string datatype in
> unseparated format and execute the statement, will work? That is, SQL
> Server will be able to understand it and store it in the appropiate
> format?
> I'll try tomorrow but can't be so easy.
> What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause? I'm
> using LIKE operator but it is rather language dependant: If SQL Server
> in Spanish, "Ago 10,2005%" is the pattern. If in English, "Aug
> 10,2005%" is the pattern. Can this also be solved wihout using BETWEEN
> and "<" and ">" operators, only with LIKE?
> Thanks very much.
>|||Thanks Ilya for the "using parameters" advice. Many problems solved
this way.
Regards.|||Thanks Tibor for that great article but I think parameters have solved
all my headaches ;-)
Kind regards,|||Yep, I should add to the article that parametizing queries has bunch of adva
ntages, among others
that ADO (or whatever API is used) will handle these things for you.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131612217.129555.137660@.g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks Tibor for that great article but I think parameters have solved
> all my headaches ;-)
> Kind regards,
>
I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
WHERE appointmentId = 1
Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
worked.
Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
0:0:00'
WHERE appointmentId = 1
But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
will be inserted as DateTimes.
Any solution will be greatly appreciated.I think that this will answer most of your questions:
http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/info_datetime.asp
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131553973.186824.98760@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
> I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
> Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
> The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
> Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
> Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
> Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
> English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
> Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
> I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
> UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
> worked.
> Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
> 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
> will be inserted as DateTimes.
> Any solution will be greatly appreciated.
>|||Thanks Tibor, but I still have got one question:
If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
problem?
Therefore, don't worrying about SQL Server language, if I convert my
DateTime value (programming in C# for example) to string datatype in
unseparated format and execute the statement, will work? That is, SQL
Server will be able to understand it and store it in the appropiate
format?
I'll try tomorrow but can't be so easy.
What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause? I'm
using LIKE operator but it is rather language dependant: If SQL Server
in Spanish, "Ago 10,2005%" is the pattern. If in English, "Aug
10,2005%" is the pattern. Can this also be solved wihout using BETWEEN
and "<" and ">" operators, only with LIKE?
Thanks very much.|||You should always use parameters and pass DateTime instead of string.
That would work for any locale and would also improve performance.
Best regards,
Ilya
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
*** Want to find answers instantly? Here's how... ***
1. Go to
http://groups-beta.google.com/group... />
work?hl=en
2. Type your question in the text box near "Search this group" button.
3. Hit "Search this group" button.
4. Read answer(s).
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131553973.186824.98760@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
> I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
> Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
> The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
> Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
> Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
> Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
> English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
> Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
> I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
> UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
> worked.
> Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
> 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
> will be inserted as DateTimes.
> Any solution will be greatly appreciated.
>|||Do you mean always use parameters with update/insert statements against
SQL Mobile 2005 and SQL Server CE databases?
Any known problems when synchronizing with SQL Server (Spanish and
English versions mainly) via Merge Replication?
Could you please post an example of an update statement using
parameters?
Thanks very much. I'm willing to try tomorrow morning.|||Yes, always. That makes conversion unnecessary and eliminates format
problems completely.
For example, DateTime is format-less, it's just a 64 bit integer.
The problem with formats only arises if you convert it to/from string. Which
also takes a lot of time.
Update/Insert sample is available in VS documentation, just look up
SqlCeCommand.Parameters property.
If your SQL Server DB uses collation which is not supported on the device,
you'll get NotSupportedException on attempt to replicate.
Best regards,
Ilya
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
*** Want to find answers instantly? Here's how... ***
1. Go to
http://groups-beta.google.com/group... />
work?hl=en
2. Type your question in the text box near "Search this group" button.
3. Hit "Search this group" button.
4. Read answer(s).
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131564804.366046.310110@.g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Do you mean always use parameters with update/insert statements against
> SQL Mobile 2005 and SQL Server CE databases?
> Any known problems when synchronizing with SQL Server (Spanish and
> English versions mainly) via Merge Replication?
> Could you please post an example of an update statement using
> parameters?
> Thanks very much. I'm willing to try tomorrow morning.
>|||> If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
> execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
> Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
> problem?
Yes.
> What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause?
Did you read the article? I have a long section about just that:
http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/in...e.asp#Searching
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131563864.355665.61160@.g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks Tibor, but I still have got one question:
> If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
> execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
> Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
> problem?
> Therefore, don't worrying about SQL Server language, if I convert my
> DateTime value (programming in C# for example) to string datatype in
> unseparated format and execute the statement, will work? That is, SQL
> Server will be able to understand it and store it in the appropiate
> format?
> I'll try tomorrow but can't be so easy.
> What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause? I'm
> using LIKE operator but it is rather language dependant: If SQL Server
> in Spanish, "Ago 10,2005%" is the pattern. If in English, "Aug
> 10,2005%" is the pattern. Can this also be solved wihout using BETWEEN
> and "<" and ">" operators, only with LIKE?
> Thanks very much.
>|||Thanks Ilya for the "using parameters" advice. Many problems solved
this way.
Regards.|||Thanks Tibor for that great article but I think parameters have solved
all my headaches ;-)
Kind regards,|||Yep, I should add to the article that parametizing queries has bunch of adva
ntages, among others
that ADO (or whatever API is used) will handle these things for you.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131612217.129555.137660@.g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks Tibor for that great article but I think parameters have solved
> all my headaches ;-)
> Kind regards,
>
Being DateTime Formats aware when accessing database
Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
WHERE appointmentId = 1
Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
worked.
Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
0:0:00'
WHERE appointmentId = 1
But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
will be inserted as DateTimes.
Any solution will be greatly appreciated.I think that this will answer most of your questions:
http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/info_datetime.asp
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131553973.186824.98760@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
> I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
> Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
> The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
> Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
> Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
> Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
> English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
> Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
> I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
> UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
> worked.
> Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
> 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
> will be inserted as DateTimes.
> Any solution will be greatly appreciated.
>|||Thanks Tibor, but I still have got one question:
If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
problem?
Therefore, don't worrying about SQL Server language, if I convert my
DateTime value (programming in C# for example) to string datatype in
unseparated format and execute the statement, will work? That is, SQL
Server will be able to understand it and store it in the appropiate
format?
I'll try tomorrow but can't be so easy.
What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause? I'm
using LIKE operator but it is rather language dependant: If SQL Server
in Spanish, "Ago 10,2005%" is the pattern. If in English, "Aug
10,2005%" is the pattern. Can this also be solved wihout using BETWEEN
and "<" and ">" operators, only with LIKE?
Thanks very much.|||You should always use parameters and pass DateTime instead of string.
That would work for any locale and would also improve performance.
Best regards,
Ilya
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
*** Want to find answers instantly? Here's how... ***
1. Go to
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework?hl=en
2. Type your question in the text box near "Search this group" button.
3. Hit "Search this group" button.
4. Read answer(s).
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131553973.186824.98760@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
> I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
> Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
> The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
> Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
> Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
> Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
> English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
> Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
> I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
> UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
> worked.
> Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
> 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
> will be inserted as DateTimes.
> Any solution will be greatly appreciated.
>|||Do you mean always use parameters with update/insert statements against
SQL Mobile 2005 and SQL Server CE databases?
Any known problems when synchronizing with SQL Server (Spanish and
English versions mainly) via Merge Replication?
Could you please post an example of an update statement using
parameters?
Thanks very much. I'm willing to try tomorrow morning.|||Yes, always. That makes conversion unnecessary and eliminates format
problems completely.
For example, DateTime is format-less, it's just a 64 bit integer.
The problem with formats only arises if you convert it to/from string. Which
also takes a lot of time.
Update/Insert sample is available in VS documentation, just look up
SqlCeCommand.Parameters property.
If your SQL Server DB uses collation which is not supported on the device,
you'll get NotSupportedException on attempt to replicate.
Best regards,
Ilya
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
*** Want to find answers instantly? Here's how... ***
1. Go to
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework?hl=en
2. Type your question in the text box near "Search this group" button.
3. Hit "Search this group" button.
4. Read answer(s).
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131564804.366046.310110@.g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Do you mean always use parameters with update/insert statements against
> SQL Mobile 2005 and SQL Server CE databases?
> Any known problems when synchronizing with SQL Server (Spanish and
> English versions mainly) via Merge Replication?
> Could you please post an example of an update statement using
> parameters?
> Thanks very much. I'm willing to try tomorrow morning.
>|||> If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
> execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
> Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
> problem?
Yes.
> What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause?
Did you read the article? I have a long section about just that:
http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/info_datetime.asp#Searching
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131563864.355665.61160@.g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks Tibor, but I still have got one question:
> If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
> execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
> Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
> problem?
> Therefore, don't worrying about SQL Server language, if I convert my
> DateTime value (programming in C# for example) to string datatype in
> unseparated format and execute the statement, will work? That is, SQL
> Server will be able to understand it and store it in the appropiate
> format?
> I'll try tomorrow but can't be so easy.
> What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause? I'm
> using LIKE operator but it is rather language dependant: If SQL Server
> in Spanish, "Ago 10,2005%" is the pattern. If in English, "Aug
> 10,2005%" is the pattern. Can this also be solved wihout using BETWEEN
> and "<" and ">" operators, only with LIKE?
> Thanks very much.
>|||Thanks Ilya for the "using parameters" advice. Many problems solved
this way.
Regards.|||Thanks Tibor for that great article but I think parameters have solved
all my headaches ;-)
Kind regards,|||Yep, I should add to the article that parametizing queries has bunch of advantages, among others
that ADO (or whatever API is used) will handle these things for you.
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131612217.129555.137660@.g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks Tibor for that great article but I think parameters have solved
> all my headaches ;-)
> Kind regards,
>
I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
WHERE appointmentId = 1
Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
worked.
Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
0:0:00'
WHERE appointmentId = 1
But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
will be inserted as DateTimes.
Any solution will be greatly appreciated.I think that this will answer most of your questions:
http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/info_datetime.asp
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131553973.186824.98760@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
> I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
> Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
> The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
> Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
> Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
> Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
> English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
> Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
> I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
> UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
> worked.
> Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
> 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
> will be inserted as DateTimes.
> Any solution will be greatly appreciated.
>|||Thanks Tibor, but I still have got one question:
If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
problem?
Therefore, don't worrying about SQL Server language, if I convert my
DateTime value (programming in C# for example) to string datatype in
unseparated format and execute the statement, will work? That is, SQL
Server will be able to understand it and store it in the appropiate
format?
I'll try tomorrow but can't be so easy.
What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause? I'm
using LIKE operator but it is rather language dependant: If SQL Server
in Spanish, "Ago 10,2005%" is the pattern. If in English, "Aug
10,2005%" is the pattern. Can this also be solved wihout using BETWEEN
and "<" and ">" operators, only with LIKE?
Thanks very much.|||You should always use parameters and pass DateTime instead of string.
That would work for any locale and would also improve performance.
Best regards,
Ilya
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
*** Want to find answers instantly? Here's how... ***
1. Go to
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework?hl=en
2. Type your question in the text box near "Search this group" button.
3. Hit "Search this group" button.
4. Read answer(s).
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131553973.186824.98760@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Maybe has been answered many times but here I go:
> I pick up a date from MonthCalendar control in my device running
> Spanish OS version. The format can be this: 23/11/2005 00:00:00.
> The server side SQL Server 2005 April CTP is in English and I'm using
> Merge Replication to fill a SQL Mobile 2005 database, also in English.
> Logically, I'm having trouble with datetime columns.
> Do I have to convert Spanish datetime picked up in the interface to
> English datetime format everytime I must do an update or insert?
> Is there any way to avoid this, to be database datetime format aware?
> I was initially trying this, but failed of course:
> UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '23/11/2005 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> Then, after manually building English DateTime format, this query
> worked.
> Changing to UPDATE APPOINTMENT SET appointmentDate = '11/23/2005
> 0:0:00'
> WHERE appointmentId = 1
> But that's not the way. I have to avoid manally building string that
> will be inserted as DateTimes.
> Any solution will be greatly appreciated.
>|||Do you mean always use parameters with update/insert statements against
SQL Mobile 2005 and SQL Server CE databases?
Any known problems when synchronizing with SQL Server (Spanish and
English versions mainly) via Merge Replication?
Could you please post an example of an update statement using
parameters?
Thanks very much. I'm willing to try tomorrow morning.|||Yes, always. That makes conversion unnecessary and eliminates format
problems completely.
For example, DateTime is format-less, it's just a 64 bit integer.
The problem with formats only arises if you convert it to/from string. Which
also takes a lot of time.
Update/Insert sample is available in VS documentation, just look up
SqlCeCommand.Parameters property.
If your SQL Server DB uses collation which is not supported on the device,
you'll get NotSupportedException on attempt to replicate.
Best regards,
Ilya
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
*** Want to find answers instantly? Here's how... ***
1. Go to
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework?hl=en
2. Type your question in the text box near "Search this group" button.
3. Hit "Search this group" button.
4. Read answer(s).
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131564804.366046.310110@.g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Do you mean always use parameters with update/insert statements against
> SQL Mobile 2005 and SQL Server CE databases?
> Any known problems when synchronizing with SQL Server (Spanish and
> English versions mainly) via Merge Replication?
> Could you please post an example of an update statement using
> parameters?
> Thanks very much. I'm willing to try tomorrow morning.
>|||> If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
> execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
> Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
> problem?
Yes.
> What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause?
Did you read the article? I have a long section about just that:
http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/info_datetime.asp#Searching
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131563864.355665.61160@.g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks Tibor, but I still have got one question:
> If I use language neutral unseparated format ('19980223 14:23:05') and
> execute an insert or and update statement both against Spanish SQL
> Server and English SQL Server, both statements will work without
> problem?
> Therefore, don't worrying about SQL Server language, if I convert my
> DateTime value (programming in C# for example) to string datatype in
> unseparated format and execute the statement, will work? That is, SQL
> Server will be able to understand it and store it in the appropiate
> format?
> I'll try tomorrow but can't be so easy.
> What about finding rows that match a concrete date where clause? I'm
> using LIKE operator but it is rather language dependant: If SQL Server
> in Spanish, "Ago 10,2005%" is the pattern. If in English, "Aug
> 10,2005%" is the pattern. Can this also be solved wihout using BETWEEN
> and "<" and ">" operators, only with LIKE?
> Thanks very much.
>|||Thanks Ilya for the "using parameters" advice. Many problems solved
this way.
Regards.|||Thanks Tibor for that great article but I think parameters have solved
all my headaches ;-)
Kind regards,|||Yep, I should add to the article that parametizing queries has bunch of advantages, among others
that ADO (or whatever API is used) will handle these things for you.
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Lonifasiko" <mloichate@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131612217.129555.137660@.g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks Tibor for that great article but I think parameters have solved
> all my headaches ;-)
> Kind regards,
>
Friday, February 10, 2012
Because of replication The server slow down....please help
Hi...
We have a SQL Server Std Edition that make syncronisation(merge
publication) with 100 mobile device.We create100 publications according to
our employees user id.We use articles with joins and user id for all
publications.The mobile devices make syncronisation over this publications.
Problem1:When I execute an insert or update statement in database , it cost
min 10 minutes for response.Last night I execute an update sql(for 10 rows)
at night.When i wake up morning,the transaction log is get full, and only 2
of the updates make succesfully.
Why database ddl operations get a long time to execute?
Problem2:How can I control transaction log automatically?
Problem3:If I make an insert from aspx page to sqlserver the data don't send
to the syncronized users.When I create the the publication again,the data
send to the user..
If I insert the data with a query screen on the sqlserver management studio,
the data send to the synronized user.What is the difference inserting a data
with aspx page and sqlserver management studio.?
I'll wait for your answers..
Thanks...
Maybe you can setup the subscription to run on differnt time not
continously...
? "The_TOZ" <tunc@.te-mob.com> ? ? ?
news:82CEB077-8802-45BE-8D49-038D55D7333F@.microsoft.com...
> Hi...
> We have a SQL Server Std Edition that make syncronisation(merge
> publication) with 100 mobile device.We create100 publications according to
> our employees user id.We use articles with joins and user id for all
> publications.The mobile devices make syncronisation over this
> publications.
>
> Problem1:When I execute an insert or update statement in database , it
> cost
> min 10 minutes for response.Last night I execute an update sql(for 10
> rows)
> at night.When i wake up morning,the transaction log is get full, and only
> 2
> of the updates make succesfully.
> Why database ddl operations get a long time to execute?
> Problem2:How can I control transaction log automatically?
> Problem3:If I make an insert from aspx page to sqlserver the data don't
> send to the syncronized users.When I create the the publication again,the
> data send to the user..
> If I insert the data with a query screen on the sqlserver management
> studio, the data send to the synronized user.What is the difference
> inserting a data with aspx page and sqlserver management studio.?
>
> I'll wait for your answers..
> Thanks...
>
|||1) That's terrible. Are you using pre-computed partitions? Try to disable
this option. The sync times will be longer but the latency you see on each
transaction will be shorter. There probably is something else on this
database causing severe waits/performance problems - you should look at it
in depth to understand it
2) Put it in full recovery model, and backup the tlog as frequently as
possible - 20 minutes is normally good enough. Also make sure you growth is
in megs not %.
3) There should not be a different between how the client gets the data. The
only problem that can occur is if the insert comes from a bcp operation. Are
you including a guid for the GUID column replication is using - normally
called rowguid? You should let SQL Server autosupply this value.
http://www.zetainteractive.com - Shift Happens!
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"The_TOZ" <tunc@.te-mob.com> wrote in message
news:82CEB077-8802-45BE-8D49-038D55D7333F@.microsoft.com...
> Hi...
> We have a SQL Server Std Edition that make syncronisation(merge
> publication) with 100 mobile device.We create100 publications according to
> our employees user id.We use articles with joins and user id for all
> publications.The mobile devices make syncronisation over this
> publications.
>
> Problem1:When I execute an insert or update statement in database , it
> cost
> min 10 minutes for response.Last night I execute an update sql(for 10
> rows)
> at night.When i wake up morning,the transaction log is get full, and only
> 2
> of the updates make succesfully.
> Why database ddl operations get a long time to execute?
> Problem2:How can I control transaction log automatically?
> Problem3:If I make an insert from aspx page to sqlserver the data don't
> send to the syncronized users.When I create the the publication again,the
> data send to the user..
> If I insert the data with a query screen on the sqlserver management
> studio, the data send to the synronized user.What is the difference
> inserting a data with aspx page and sqlserver management studio.?
>
> I'll wait for your answers..
> Thanks...
>
We have a SQL Server Std Edition that make syncronisation(merge
publication) with 100 mobile device.We create100 publications according to
our employees user id.We use articles with joins and user id for all
publications.The mobile devices make syncronisation over this publications.
Problem1:When I execute an insert or update statement in database , it cost
min 10 minutes for response.Last night I execute an update sql(for 10 rows)
at night.When i wake up morning,the transaction log is get full, and only 2
of the updates make succesfully.
Why database ddl operations get a long time to execute?
Problem2:How can I control transaction log automatically?
Problem3:If I make an insert from aspx page to sqlserver the data don't send
to the syncronized users.When I create the the publication again,the data
send to the user..
If I insert the data with a query screen on the sqlserver management studio,
the data send to the synronized user.What is the difference inserting a data
with aspx page and sqlserver management studio.?
I'll wait for your answers..
Thanks...
Maybe you can setup the subscription to run on differnt time not
continously...
? "The_TOZ" <tunc@.te-mob.com> ? ? ?
news:82CEB077-8802-45BE-8D49-038D55D7333F@.microsoft.com...
> Hi...
> We have a SQL Server Std Edition that make syncronisation(merge
> publication) with 100 mobile device.We create100 publications according to
> our employees user id.We use articles with joins and user id for all
> publications.The mobile devices make syncronisation over this
> publications.
>
> Problem1:When I execute an insert or update statement in database , it
> cost
> min 10 minutes for response.Last night I execute an update sql(for 10
> rows)
> at night.When i wake up morning,the transaction log is get full, and only
> 2
> of the updates make succesfully.
> Why database ddl operations get a long time to execute?
> Problem2:How can I control transaction log automatically?
> Problem3:If I make an insert from aspx page to sqlserver the data don't
> send to the syncronized users.When I create the the publication again,the
> data send to the user..
> If I insert the data with a query screen on the sqlserver management
> studio, the data send to the synronized user.What is the difference
> inserting a data with aspx page and sqlserver management studio.?
>
> I'll wait for your answers..
> Thanks...
>
|||1) That's terrible. Are you using pre-computed partitions? Try to disable
this option. The sync times will be longer but the latency you see on each
transaction will be shorter. There probably is something else on this
database causing severe waits/performance problems - you should look at it
in depth to understand it
2) Put it in full recovery model, and backup the tlog as frequently as
possible - 20 minutes is normally good enough. Also make sure you growth is
in megs not %.
3) There should not be a different between how the client gets the data. The
only problem that can occur is if the insert comes from a bcp operation. Are
you including a guid for the GUID column replication is using - normally
called rowguid? You should let SQL Server autosupply this value.
http://www.zetainteractive.com - Shift Happens!
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"The_TOZ" <tunc@.te-mob.com> wrote in message
news:82CEB077-8802-45BE-8D49-038D55D7333F@.microsoft.com...
> Hi...
> We have a SQL Server Std Edition that make syncronisation(merge
> publication) with 100 mobile device.We create100 publications according to
> our employees user id.We use articles with joins and user id for all
> publications.The mobile devices make syncronisation over this
> publications.
>
> Problem1:When I execute an insert or update statement in database , it
> cost
> min 10 minutes for response.Last night I execute an update sql(for 10
> rows)
> at night.When i wake up morning,the transaction log is get full, and only
> 2
> of the updates make succesfully.
> Why database ddl operations get a long time to execute?
> Problem2:How can I control transaction log automatically?
> Problem3:If I make an insert from aspx page to sqlserver the data don't
> send to the syncronized users.When I create the the publication again,the
> data send to the user..
> If I insert the data with a query screen on the sqlserver management
> studio, the data send to the synronized user.What is the difference
> inserting a data with aspx page and sqlserver management studio.?
>
> I'll wait for your answers..
> Thanks...
>
Labels:
according,
create100,
database,
device,
downplease,
edition,
mergepublication,
microsoft,
mobile,
mysql,
oracle,
publications,
replication,
server,
slow,
sql,
std,
syncronisation,
toour
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)